Off Panama’s Caribbean coast lies the tiny island of Gardí Sugdub, one of the 50 islands home to the Indigenous Guna people for over 300 years. Now, due to climate change-driven rising sea levels, that home is in severe danger. In recent years, the tiny 1200-foot-long and 450-foot-wide island has experienced severe flooding that has destabilized everyday activities for the community. The ocean is central to the Guna people’s way of life and supports the island's main income streams: fishing and tourism. These have been significantly affected by worsening tidal floods, storms, and strong winds.
UN and Others Attempt to Galvanize Climate Action as Vulnerable Communities Continue to Experience Loss and Damage
On the heels of the Africa Climate Week in early September and happening just over two months before the beginning of COP28 in Dubai, on Wednesday UN Secretary-General António Guterres hosted the first-ever Climate Ambition Summit during the UN General Assembly high-level week in New York. As the name suggests, the goal of the summit was to identify and encourage serious and urgent action on climate change.
This is just the latest call for climate action from the Secretary-General. With this summer’s record-breaking temperatures, Guterres remarked that the “era of global boiling” and “climate breakdown” is upon us. These emotive words mirror what civil society organizations and even many governments have been saying for quite some time now: not only must we act now, but we must act at the proper scale, something that is still missing from many talks and proposals.
And while discussions at the international level continue, communities around the world continue to experience loss and damage from climate change. For these communities, high-level talks are a distant echo of what they are seeing each and every day: reduced livelihood options, threats to physical and mental well-being, entrenched poverty and development losses, human rights violations, and forced displacement.
UN Decision on Torres Strait Islanders a Major Win for Indigenous Peoples and Climate Justice
The UN Human Rights Committee has found that Australia violated the rights of Torres Strait Islanders by failing to adequately protect them from the impacts of climate change, in a major decision with implications for climate justice and the protection of Indigenous Peoples’ rights in the face of climate change, as reported by Kristen Lyons in the Law Society of New South Wales Journal. The Committee concluded that Australia’s insufficient climate action constituted a violation of the Islanders rights to enjoy their culture and “be free from arbitrary interferences with their private life, family, and home,” as the UN High Commissioner for Rights press release states.
To Mitigate Climate Change, Combat Slavery and Protect Climate Migrants & Refugees
Addressing the needs and protection of climate migrants is a matter of human rights, but according to a new study linking modern slavery and climate change, it might also hold massive potential in mitigating climate change. Astonishingly, modern slavery emits 2.54 billion tons of CO2 a year and over the past few years, increasing correlations have been made recognizing the nexus between climate change, migration and modern slavery. According to Anti-Slavery International, modern slavery can come in the form of human trafficking, forced labor, debt bondage, forced prostitution and child labor among others, and now climate-induced migration is increasing migrants’ vulnerability to modern slavery.
Weekend Feature: Who is Accountable When Climate Change Displaces Indigenous People?
Climate change will be the third iteration of displacement inflicted on Indigenous communities by the United States, all of which threaten the enjoyment of the rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Canada Court Rules US 'Not Safe' for Asylum Seekers
Canada’s federal court has invalidated its Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) with the United States in place since 2004 because it has determined that the US violates the human rights of refugees. An STCA requires an asylum-seeker to seek protection in the first safe country they reach. Under this agreement, both countries have been able to turn back asylum-seekers attempting to enter at official crossings because they each recognized the other as safe places to seek refuge.
In a 60-page ruling, Judge Ann Marie McDonald ruled the deal as a violation of Canada’s Charter of Rights that prevents the government from impeding the right to life, liberty and security. The deal was thus declared unconstitutional because of the US government’s practice of imprisoning migrants and asylum-seekers, citing the conditions asylum-seekers face in detention, including the lack of access to adequate health care and legal counsel.
Judge McDonald found the experience of Nedeira Mustefa particularly compelling, a Muslim asylum-seeker from Ethiopia. After Canada returned her to the United States, Mustefa was detained and placed in solitary confinement, where despite telling guards of her religious beliefs, she believes she was fed pork, was placed in solitary confinement, which she said was “a terrifying, isolating and psychologically traumatic experience”
The court ruling is suspended for six months to give Parliament time to respond, which it can appeal, and litigants could potentially appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. Otherwise, the ruling is set to go into effect on January 22.
The agreement has been under fire in Canada since the election of Donald Trump, who has actively sought to limit asylum, refugee resettlement and immigration in the United States, as well as detain and separate migrants. With increasing arrivals of Central American asylum-seekers who are fleeing violence, gang violence, crime but also the impacts of climate change and climate variability that has exacerbated poverty and left many parts food insecure, the US has pursued and entered into Safe Third Country Agreements with several Central American countries.
University of California, Hastings College of Law professor Karen Musalo, who testified on behalf of litigants, called the decision “an indictment of the inhumanity of the American detention system for asylum-seekers.”
We could not agree more.
(BBC, Washington Post, NY Times)
We have written extensively about asylum conditions in the United States and the situation of Central American asylum-seekers, including the climate conditions in their countries of origin. For further reading, here’s one such Feature.